It was a full house on 30 April at the joint launch of two important books, Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations, edited by Professor Carsten Stahn, Jennifer S. Easterday, and Jens Iverson (all members of faculty at the Grotius Centre for International Legal Studies) and Proportionality in International Law, written byProfessor Michael A. Newton and Professor Larry May. The first volumeprovides a detailed understanding of the development and nature of jus post bellum as a concept, including its foundations, criticisms, and relationship to related concepts (such as transitional justice, and the responsibility to protect). The second critically assesses the law of proportionality in a uniquely interdisciplinary way. The crowd was treated to interesting presentations by Professor Naomi Roht Arriaza, Distinguished Professor of Law, University of California, Hastings College of the Law, and Judge Howard Morrison, Judge of the International Criminal Court and International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, as well as a panel with editors Professor Carsten Stahn, Jennifer S. Easterday, Jens Iverson, and author Professor Michael A. Newton.
New Grotius Centre publication on Jus Post Bellum
The Jus Post Bellum project is glad to announce the publication of a new work by Oxford University Press (‘Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations’) which examines the content and normative foundations of jus post bellum. The book (edited by Carsten Stahn, Jennifer Easterday and Jens Iverson) provides a modern account of core concepts underlying transitions from conflict to peace, i.e. the law ('jus'), temporal aspects of application ('post'), and the nexus of the concept to peace and different types of armed conflict ('bellum'). The volume examines the development and nature of jus post bellum, including its foundations, criticisms, and relationship to related concepts (e.g., transitional justice, responsibility to protect). It investigates the relationship of the concept to jus ad bellum and jus in bello, and its relevance in internal armed conflicts and peacebuilding. It reviews contemporary approaches towards ending of conflict, including indicators for the end of conflict, exit strategies, and institutional responses. It seeks to clarify emerging norms, principles and practices, drawing on disparate bodies and sources of international law such as peace agreements, treaty law, self-determination, norms governing peace operations and the status of foreign armed forces, environmental law, human rights, and amnesty law. The volume contains 26 chapters written by leading experts, including several Leiden scholars (Eric de Brabandere, Dov Jacobs and Freya Baetens). It was made possible by a Vidi grant of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. For follow-up activities of the Jus Post Bellum project on‘Peacebuilding and Environmental Damage’ and ‘Property and Investment’ in June 2014, see here.
Leiden Team wins Jessup National Round
On 21 February, Leiden's Jessup team won the National Rounds of the Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition,
thereby qualifying for the International Rounds in Washington, D.C. in April. The team won prizes for the best memorial for the applicant, the best applicant oralist (Ishara McKenna), the best respondent oralist (Douglas Gibbs), the best overall oralist (Ishara McKenna), and overall winner.
Second edition of the International Moot Court for High Schools held at Campus The Hague
From 21 to 24 January 2014 high schools students from 15 different countries, including Mongolia, Russia, China, Sweden, the United States and Venezuela, gathered in The Hague for the second edition of the International Moot Court in The Hague. After three days of preliminary rounds, held at Campus The Hague, the finals took place at the Peace Palace.
Leiden Fact-Finding Project discussed Future of Human Rights Fact-Finding at New York University
On 1-2 November 2013, NYU’s Center for Human Rights and Global Justice hosted a conference entitled ‘Human Rights Fact-Finding in the Twenty-first Century’. The Grotius Centre contributed two papers to the conference which form part of the fact-finding project of the Centre, carried out in cooperation with the Hague Institute for Global Justice. Prof. dr. Larissa van den Herik and Catherine Harwood spoke about the impact of the use of international criminal law as a normative framework by international commissions of inquiry. Prof. dr. Carsten Stahn and Dov Jacobs discussed the interaction between human rights fact-finding and international criminal proceedings. The conference also explored possibilities offered by new technologies to investigate alleged human rights violations; issues of politics and imperialism; roles of victims and witnesses; fact-finding in advocacy, enforcement, and litigation; and the utility of fact-finding guidelines. One of the outputs of the conference is a volume of essays to be edited by Philip Alston and Sarah Knuckey.
Larissa van den Herik
"Collective security is meant to protect and not to undermine human rights. The challenge is to solidly embed human rights in any UN sanctions regime."
Children's Rights Moot Court Competition 2014
The First Edition will be held from 18 to 20 November 2014 at the Leiden Law School.
Follow the Grotius Centre on Twitter
Like the Grotius Centre on Facebook